WHO IS AGAINST THE SYRIAN WAR ON THE WORLD’S STAGE AND WHY IS JOHN KERRY USING AN OLD 2003 IRAQ PHOTO AND YouTube VIDEOS TO PUSH AMERICA INTO WAR AGAINST SYRIA?…
When Bush was in office, we were all able to live productive lives knowing America was safe under his administration, letting us focus on our families, and making better lives for ourselves. Since Obama got into office, it’s been one catastrophe after another. We can’t even go one day without him and his henchman pulling another fast one over on us. We can’t breathe without being inundated with consistent Obama drama.
America is no longer a shining light upon a hill, it is fast becoming wonderful memories disappearing into a big black hole. How did Obama get into office when nobody knew anything about him? That’s how! He got into office because nobody really knew anything about him. We’re all finding out the hard way, bit by bit, as he rears his ugly head, just what he’s made of, and it isn’t pretty. I knew all along, as did others, about this snake-in-the-grass, but the masses bought into his worthless words of “hope” and “change”. We’re all seeing now what version of “hope” and “change” he meant.
We’ve been hearing lie after lie from this administration, but I think Obama’s days in the sun are starting to turn to gray skies when all is said and done. He has always shown such contempt for this country, and ironically, this country and countries all over the world are showing discontentment for him now.
I remember watching a video where he was shown boarding Marine One to a saluting Marine, gave a half-assed salute to someone onboard while going through the doorway, then someone inside apparently told him to get his butt back out there and try to appear presidential to the Marine, he went back out there and instead of a salute, Obama gave him a handshake. I thank God I wasn’t stupid enough to vote for that idiot—either time!
Then we hear John Kerry touting quite dramatically, “We saw rows of dead lined up in burial shrouds, the white linen unstained by a single drop of blood”, referring to this picture…
…claiming that those were the bodies of Syria’s chemical weapons massacre. We later learn that the photo he talked about was not from Syria. Heck, it wasn’t even from this decade. What he won’t tell us is that the photo he referred to was taken by Mr. di Lauro from Getty Images picture agency in 2003 during the Iraqi war under another Hussein dictator—Saddam.
Ironically, Kerry uses that image from the Iraqi war to call upon our sympathies, but there was no sympathy for Bush when he wanted to dethrone Saddam, where that picture originated from. Bush was met with opposition, yet now, we’re all asked to join together with Obama. Bull! He doesn’t even know who performed these heinous acts, or does he?
Mr. di Lauro describes his reaction here…
“I went home at 3am and I opened the BBC page which had a front page story about what happened in Syria and I almost felt off from my chair.
“One of my pictures from Iraq was used by the BBC web site as a front page illustration claiming that those were the bodies of yesterday’s massacre in Syria and that the picture was sent by an activist.
“Instead the picture was taken by me and it’s on my web site, on the feature section regarding a story I did In Iraq during the war called Iraq, the aftermath of Saddam.
He added he was less concerned about an apology or the use of image without consent, adding: “What is amazing it’s that a news organization has a picture proving a massacre that happened yesterday in Syria and instead it’s a picture that was taken in 2003 of a totally different massacre.
“Someone is using someone else’s picture for propaganda on purpose.”
When someone wildly exaggerates a story, it is only to benefit themselves and hide the truth for some dark reason. Obama and Kerry are grossly undermining our intelligence, and it will come back to haunt them. I’ve got to hand it to Obama, though, he needed a mother of a diversion to get our attention (and the media’s) away from all his other scandals that are mounting as high as America’s debt, especially about Benghazi, but unbeknownst to the both of these evil twins, we will never forget about Benghazi, and the rest of the truth will come out, in spite of Obama’s diversions surrounding us.
I never thought in a million years that I would be buzzing by a Russian news site, but here I am, doing it today—I like to keep my options open. Pravda, a Russian, Communist-leaning news site, has called out Obama, and I agree with just about everything this author has to say about Obama in both of the articles I’ve posted below: The first article is “Obama Versus The World” and the other, “Barack Obama: The Worst President In The History Of The USA”, both articles written by Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey.
For starters, they call out some statistics from The Drudge Report, where 729,336 votes were cast to the question, “Give Obama authority to conduct military operations in Syria? An astounding 667,929 votes were placed against, which is 92% of the votes, with just 8% in favor. Even Jon Stewart, who loves Obama, called him out on the IRS scandal.
There was a recent take-over of the village of Maaloula by Syrian Islamist rebels, where they attacked the Christian center and told Christians, “You either convert to Islam or you will be beheaded”. This is the MO of savage beasts, and most likely the orchestrators of the chemical attacks in Syria. This begs the question, who’s side is Obama on? Why isn’t Obama condemning radical Islamists who are beheading Christians. After all, he’s tried hard to convince us all that he’s a Christian, hasn’t he? Why is there no anger about these attacks on innocent Christians?
CNN showed snippets from the videos Obama showed Congress to help persuade them. Weird how Obama once blamed a YouTube video for the Benghazi terrorist attacks, yet he’s now using YouTube to further his agenda on an attack in Syria. The ironies are surrounding Obama lately.
Obama is preparing to talk with us tomorrow night. From him, there will be a lot of boiler plate material from past speeches, many Bush references, a lot of arrogant stances with his nose tilting up in the air in that arrogant Obama manner, many pregnant pauses and a lot of Uh’s. From us, there will be a lot of Zzzs…
Obama versus the world
Barack Obama, Nobel Peace Prize-winner, states that what is at stake is universal values because “I didn’t set a red line. The world did” in his words. Let us then examine the opinion polls and draw a conclusion as to whether Barack Obama is in syntony with the world, or whether he stands pitifully alone, advocating a criminal act once again tarnishing the image of his country.
We may start with the reports on the influential Drudge Report opinion poll, in which 729,336 votes were cast on the question: Give Obama authority to conduct military operations in Syria? The result was 667,929 votes against, or 92 per cent, and just eight per cent in favour, reflecting a general trend in the United States of America with eight to nine per cent in favour of what President Obama proposes. The ABC-Washington Post poll shows around 60% against missile strikes; the most favourable poll to Obama inside the USA is the Pew Report, which claims that the No vote is close to 50% and the Yes, some 29%. So much for his own country, now let us go abroad.
At an official level, China is against the attack, India is against the attack, Russia is against the attack, Iran is against the attack, Germany is against the attack, most of Latin America is against the attack, South Africa is against the attack, like most of the African continent … the list goes on and on and on and on and on, representing an official position against the attack representing the vast majority of humankind.
On the United Nations Security Council, Russia is against the attack, China is against the attack and the United Kingdom, while the Government is in favour, its Parliament is against. In fact, even in countries whose official position is in favour of military intervention, for example the UK, the people are against, in this case just 8% favour intervention.
66% of Britons said they did not care if the UK’s decision against military intervention damaged relations with the United States (BBC poll); in France, whose President Hollande has made declarations insinuating he would support a US attack (against the Rome Statute which France has signed), a BVA poll reported by Le Parisien-Aujourd’hui en France, shows 64% of those polled against military action.
So rather than having a red line drawn by the international community in favour of military intervention, we see clearly a lying John Kerry who used photographic evidence to back up his claim that military intervention was justified which was taken in 2003 in Iraq, who denies al-Qaeda are in action in Syria among the “rebel” forces the west supported from the beginning and we see a delusional Nobel Peace Prize-winner, Obama, whose sanity one must now place in question.
We see a red line drawn by the international community against military intervention and we see a red line drawn around the feet of President Obama as he stands alone, arrogantly and defiantly supporting military action which nobody wants and which is illegal under international law, whatever Congress decides.
It is President Obama against the world and Barack Obama is about to draw the outlines of his own political epitaph and the standing of his country in the international community.
Here’s another eye-opener from Pravda written by Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey just two days later. The author is correct in saying that in the history of the United States Of America, Obama is the worst person to set foot in the White House, and he did it via voter fraud…
Barack Obama: The worst President in the history of the USA
Make no mistake: Barack Hussein Obama is preparing to give a speech to the citizens of the United States of America next Tuesday in which he is planning to justify military action against Syria, with or without a nod from Congress. If he does so, he will write his name in the darkest annals of history.
George W. Bush was the human epitome of the saying, and pardon me, “sh*t stinks” because with him, you knew what you were getting, it was raw, it was in your face, it was unsophisticated, brash, rash, harsh, arrogance, belligerence, chauvinism, it was kick-a*s diplomacy at its very worst, it was riding roughshod over the international community, it was insulting to every norm or precept of common decency… but it was undisguised. It was honest.
With Barack Obama, there is a mist of perfume which disguises the filth that lies below his policies, a cloak, a mantle of decency, a promise of “change”, mere words used, abused and manipulated by a cynical coward devoid of any emotional intelligence at all, who does not have the guts to stand up to the lobbies pulling his strings, the corporate neo-con elitists who created his Presidency. Barack Obama’s entire persona is dishonest, he is a fraud of the worst kind, a siren’s song; his policy is double-faced, double-tongued, double-dealing and plain, downright deceitful.
Barack Obama promises one thing, he delivers another. He promises change, he receives a Nobel Peace Prize not for what he has done but for the breath of fresh air he represents and what does he do?
He supports terrorists in Libya, playing along with an Anglo-French imperialistic dream to steal Libya’s sovereign fund and pillage its resources, destroying a State which provided for its people. Then at the same time, he supports terrorists in Syria, arming and financing terrorist groups using his Middle Eastern bed-pals, Saudi Arabia and Qatar and regional monster Turkey.
It is a pea-brained, nonsensical, short-sighted and criminally reckless foreign policy, it is as illogical as it is dangerous and it is bound to rebound and blow up in Obama’s face. Detailed scientific evidence gathered by Russia backs up Moscow’s claim that it was the Syrian terrorists supported by the West which have carried out gas attacks, not Government forces.
The United States of America has not produced any evidence incriminating the Government of Bashar al-Assad in the recent chemical weapons attack in Ghouta while the finger of suspicion once again points at the terrorist forces backed by the Obama regime trying to frame the Syrian Arab Army.
However with a policy which uses deceit comes the need for intelligence and logic. What Government force is going to use chemical weapons in an area where its own troops are fighting (Obama focuses on images of children – one such image used by Kerry was taken in 2003 in Iraq – but there are other images of Syrian soldiers in hospital which he has chosen to ignore), what Government force is going to deploy chemical weaponry in an area where it is winning, what Government force is going to deploy such weaponry on the eve of a visit from UN experts?
Every time the UN has gone to Syria, the terrorists Obama backs have deployed chemical weapons.
Let us then conclude that Barack Obama is the worst President in the history of the United States of America because he has insulted not only the Nobel Institution to its core but also the international community and his own people by disregarding basic and common human values, supporting Islamist terrorists, including al-Qaeda pandering to the whims of the lobbies pulling his strings.
Any vote from Congress is meaningless in an international context because the forum of international law governing this case is the United Nations Security Council. If the United States of America does not like that, tough, then why did it sign the agreement? We now wait to see whether Congress listens to its Constituencies or whether it blows a raspberry in the faces of the American people sick and tired of their manipulation of fear and facts in their lying murderous schemes.
And this is the guy who stood for “change”? Change of what?