Posted on April 22, 2009. Filed under: News And Politics... |

Are we supposed to be surprised?  This story claims that "several company representatives are saying that none of the money borrowed from the government has been used to fund lobbying activities".  Well, there is no way to prove this, and they know that.  What I can’t understand is that these companies cried poor-mouth and received billions of dollars so how can they even think of saying that the millions they’re spending on lobbyists are not from TARP funds.  They didn’t have the money to fund lobbyists until after they received a government handout.  Just look at what these companies are doing to us, though.  The money these banks received was supposed to go toward loans for us.  These banks just turned around and upped the interest rates on our loans and credit cards!  Where is the government’s outrage over what these crooks are doing to us?  It’s non-existent, and I feel it’s because Obama is paying back all the people who paved his way to the White House, as I’ve said in many previous posts.
Notice how ever since Obama got into office, our government has been a revolving door for large banks, corporations, automakers, ACORN… all the people who helped Obama win the White House.  Obama may be using semi-harsh words against these companies, but you won’t see him taking this money back.  As a matter of fact, these companies are saying that "the government won’t take the money back".  I don’t believe that for a minute.  I feel that this is what our government is telling them to say.  In reality, this is our government’s way of appeasing the public while letting the companies keep their "thank you" money from Obama.  What we’re seeing now is a steady stream of Obama’s "payback".  Get used to it as there will be more…
Bailed-out firms spend millions on lobbying

GM, banks find cash to fund bids to sway lawmakers, Obama administration
By Dan Eggen
The Washington Post
updated 7:41 a.m. ET, Wed., April 22, 2009

Top recipients of federal bailout money spent more than $10 million on political lobbying in the first three months of this year, including aggressive efforts aimed at blocking executive pay limits and tougher financial regulations, according to newly filed disclosure records.

The biggest spenders among major firms in the group included General Motors, which spent nearly $1 million a month on lobbying, and Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase, which together spent more than $2.5 million in their efforts to sway lawmakers and Obama administration officials on a wide range of financial issues. In all, major bailout recipients have spent more than $22 million on lobbying in the six months since the government began doling out rescue funds, Senate disclosure records show.

The new lobbying totals come at a time of mounting anger in Congress and among the public over the actions of many bailed-out firms, which have bristled at attempts to cap excessive bonuses and have loudly complained about the restrictions placed on hundreds of billions of dollars in government loans. Administration officials said this week that top officials at Chrysler Financial turned away a $750 million government loan in favor of pricier private financing because executives didn’t want to abide by new federal limits on pay.

The reports revived objections from advocacy groups and some lawmakers, who say firms should not be lobbying against stricter oversight at the same time they are receiving billions from the government through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP.

"Taxpayers are subsidizing a legislative agenda that is inimical to their interests and offensive to what the whole TARP program is about," said William Patterson, executive director of CtW Investment Group, which is affiliated with a coalition of labor unions. "It’s business as usual with taxpayers picking up the bill."

But several company representatives said yesterday that none of the money borrowed from the government has been used to fund lobbying activities — though there is no mechanism to verify that. Financial firms have successfully quashed proposed legislation that would explicitly ban the use of TARP money for lobbying or campaign contributions.

‘Very complicated policy debates’
GM spokesman Greg Martin said that maintaining a lobbying presence is vital to ensure that the automaker has a say when major policy decisions are made. "We are part of what is arguably one of the most regulated industries, and we provide a voice in very complicated policy debates," Martin said.

According to quarterly lobbying reports that were due Monday, more than a dozen financial firms and carmakers that have received TARP assistance spent money on lobbying during the first three months of this year. After Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase, top lobbyists included American Express, Wells Fargo Bank, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

Most of the companies spent less on lobbying this year than they did during the first quarter of 2008. J.P. Morgan, for example, spent $1.43 million in early 2008, compared with $1.31 million this year. Others, however, showed increased spending, including Capital One Financial, which doubled its quarterly lobbying expenditures to more than $400,000.

The lobbying records do not yet include campaign contributions by corporate lobbyists. Bank of America, for example, which spent $660,000 on lobbying in the first quarter, also gave more than $218,000 in campaign contributions through its PAC, according to the Federal Election Commission.

The Citigroup lobbying report provides a glimpse of the troubled company’s interests in Washington, including credit card rules, student loan policies, and patent and trademark issues. Citigroup chief executive Vikram S. Pandit and other company officials lobbied fiercely against a House bill approved in March that would have placed a 90 percent tax on bonuses for traders, executives and bankers earning more than $250,000 at firms that had been bailed out by taxpayers. The proposal stalled in the Senate.

Citigroup spokeswoman Molly Meiners said the company "specifically prohibits the use of TARP funds for lobbying-related activities" and said the funds "are subject to an oversight and approvals process."

Database editor Sarah Cohen contributed to this report.




Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: