DEVAL PATRICK’S SUGAR HIGH ON TAXES…

Posted on February 3, 2009. Filed under: News And Politics... |

 
Remember Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysberg Address where he states, "…that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
 
Well, thanks to the ignorant people who voted Democrat, we now have a Democratic government "of the government, by the Government, for the Government"…
 
QB
 

"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I am here to help."

Ronald Reagan

 
 
 
Massachusetts had a secret little plan in store for New Hampshire to try to slow the tide of residents pouring over the border to feed John Lynch’s (not so) little coffers. A repeal of the state price regulations law that has been in effect since 1945.  This little known law made it an offense for stores to sell cigarettes below a state imposed minimum.  That’s right, the state actually guaranteed a higher profit for tobacco companies by refusing to allow lower prices on cigarettes.  This law was promoted as helping to sway younger people from smoking.  Needless to say, the anti-smoking nazis are up in arms about the repeal of this law, but you know what?  If it means more people putting tax dollars into the hands of Deval Patrick, then he says to hell with stopping young people from smoking.  Deval Patrick and Massachusetts needs more revenue because the casino bill fell through while Patrick was in New York signing a million dollar book deal.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Now there are more government interventions…
 
 

State chases sales taxes in N.H.

Targets Mass. tire purchasers

Erik Pizano put tires on a Massachusetts vehicle at Town Fair Tire Center in Nashua. The company is fighting the tax policy. (Globe Staff Photo / Mark Wilson)
Globe Staff / February 3, 2009

Massachusetts has ordered a tire chain to charge Bay State residents a 5 percent sales tax on their purchases in New Hampshire in an unprecedented move that could have huge implications for consumers and other merchants.

Town Fair Tire Centers, which is based in Connecticut but has six shops in New Hampshire and 25 in Massachusetts, is fighting back with a lawsuit now before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that accuses the state of violating the US commerce clause. If Massachusetts prevails in the case, which is likely to be heard next month, it could drive up costs for consumers and retailers such as Best Buy and Sears that sell expensive home appliances and other goods in New Hampshire, which doesn’t have a state sales tax. It also could mean millions of dollars in new tax revenue for the Commonwealth as it faces a $1.1 billion budget deficit, according to tax analysts.

"This is a first-of-its-kind case," said Fred Nicely, general counsel of the Council on State Taxation, a nonprofit trade association of multistate corporations engaged in interstate and international business. "There’s huge ramifications to the entire retail community."

To others, it’s a case of "Taxachusetts" striking back at the "Live Free or Die" pride of New Hampshire. The Granite State has long lured Massachusetts residents over the border to enjoy tax-free shopping. New Hampshire Governor John Lynch has even gotten involved, kicking off a campaign one year to persuade Bay Staters to head north so they don’t have to cram all of their shopping in when the Commonwealth decides to hold a three-day "sales tax holiday."

The idea that Massachusetts consumers can’t enjoy a tax break isn’t sitting well with the locals in this troubled economy. Just last week Governor Deval Patrick proposed taxing alcohol, candy, and soda, and raising taxes on hotels and meals.

"People are free to buy their tires wherever they want at the best price," said Erin Willet of Lunenburg, who routinely drives 20 miles to Nashua, N.H., to avoid tax on household items and big ticket purchases like appliances. "If Massachusetts doesn’t like it, then they should have predictable tax-free holidays so that people can plan their shopping to take advantage of it."

The Town Fair Tire legal battle dates back to 2003, when the Massachusetts Department of Revenue audited the three New Hampshire stores Town Fair Tire operated at the time, after receiving evidence that Bay State residents were driving up to buy tires and having them installed at the chain’s shops. The auditors identified 313 sales made to Massachusetts consumers, based on invoices that included Commonwealth addresses and in some cases telephone numbers. The state’s tax authorities say the records demonstrate that Town Fair Tire knew the customer intended to use the goods in the Commonwealth, and therefore should have charged a 5 percent "use tax" – essentially a sales tax for items purchased for use or storage in the Bay State. Those taxes then would be given to Massachusetts. Following the audit, Massachusetts authorities assessed the company about $108,947 in tax, penalties, and interest related to the sales.

Kevin W. Brown, general counsel of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, said the case attempts to address a difficult and protracted problem. Currently, New Hampshire merchants who also have shops in Massachusetts are required to collect taxes on items that are bought by Bay State residents over the Internet and via catalogs and mailed to their homes.

the 1990s, a similar lawsuit involving Circuit City determined that the Commonwealth could require the electronics chain to charge taxes on merchandise ordered in Massachusetts but picked up in the Granite State. But there have been no court cases in Massachusetts involving purchases made entirely out of state.
 
Until now, consumers have been solely responsible for paying use taxes for eligible purchases initiated and completed in New Hampshire when filing their state tax returns. This isn’t an issue in other border states, like Connecticut and Rhode Island, because they charge sales tax and there is less incentive for Bay State consumers to cross the border.

But many Massachusetts residents don’t file use taxes, tax authorities say, and individual violators are nearly impossible to detect. The invoices and receipts kept by retailers, however, have made it possible for the state to track down the customers’ plans to use their merchandise in the Commonwealth, according to Brown.

"The use tax is designed to take away an incentive for the buyer to go out of state and not pay the taxes," Brown said. "That’s why we need to be enforcing the use tax because it protects local vendors." Brown said he did not have figures for how much Massachusetts loses in sales taxes because of purchases made in New Hampshire. But several economists estimate losses to be anywhere from $130 million to $410 million annually.

Town Fair Tire, however, says it has no certain knowledge of where the tires will be used – Concord, N.H., or Concord, Mass. – and is under no obligation to ask customers where they plan to bring the merchandise after they leave the store.

Consumers buying tires aren’t always the owners and operators of the car, nor is the address given necessarily linked to the vehicle, according to David Nagle, tax partner at Sullivan & Worcester LLP in Boston, which is representing Town Fair Tire. The company also says it could be held liable for incorrectly guessing where customers plan to use the tires and charging tax when it isn’t warranted.

Town Fair Tire appealed the assessment to the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board and lost last June. The merchant then brought its case to the appeals court, accusing the Commonwealth, among other allegations, of violating the commerce clause that gives Congress the right to regulate interstate trade. In December, the Supreme Judicial Court, on its own motion, took the case.

While Massachusetts tax authorities say the Town Fair Tire case has narrow application, Brown said it could conceivably be applied to other merchandise installed on vehicles, such as ski racks or stereo systems.

If the state succeeds with the tire case, tax specialists say, the ruling could have implications for many New Hampshire merchants who collect customer information or offer financing. Furniture stores and electronics chains, for example, could conceivably be required to determine consumers’ intended use for a leather chair, a big screen television, or the contents of their entire shopping cart.

"We’re just outraged at this case," said Nancy Kyle, president of the Retail Merchants Association of New Hampshire. "New Hampshire prides itself on being sales-tax free. It’s not a New Hampshire retailer’s job to track where someone goes with their merchandise and then pay sales taxes to other states. What’s to stop Maine or Vermont and Canada from doing the same?"

Jenn Abelson can be reached at abelson@globe.com.

Massachusetts will soon suffer a backlash with people who purchased in Massachusetts from other states demanding that they get their 5% tax reimbursed.  Way to go, Democrats!  So much for "helping small businesses".  This is one sure-fire way of swaying residents and businesses out of Massachusetts.  All politicians should stop looking for the taxpayers to bail them out of their corruption and mismanagement.  They have no clue what we’re going through.  Who the heck voted for these DemocRAT pigs anyway?  We’re surely heading toward a Depression with all the pork projects being slapped around…
 
QB
 
 
 
Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: